Review of robotics competition. Special and rescue underground robotics

Review of robotics competition. Special and rescue underground robotics

Roman V. Meshcheryakov
Doctor of Technical Science, Professor, V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Leading Research Scientist, 65, Profsoyuznaya ul., Moscow, 117997, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., ORCID: 0000-0002-1129-8434

Boris V. Ilyukhin
Research Center for Education Quality Assessment and Management Systems, FIRO, RANEPA, Director, 85, Vernadsky pr., Moscow, 119571, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., ORCID: 0000-0002-9439-9942

Received March 14, 2022

Abstract
The development of robotics technologies requires an increase in the level of scientific and technical developments and the creation of a profile reserve, as well as the formation of a system for training highly qualified specialists. One of the ways to assess the achieved level of development and qualifications of engineering teams is to hold competitions at various levels. The article provides an overview of various events in competitive robotics. In the first part, the competition in the ground and underground environment is considered. The competitions are structured according to the format, type of the competition, the environment of functioning and the age of the participants. Conclusions are made about the prospects of various events of competitive robotics, as well as the relevance of some of them.

Key words
Robotics, competition, education, science.

DOI
10.31776/RTCJ.11101

Bibliographic description
Meshcheryakov, R.V. and Ilyukhin, B.V. (2023). Review of robotics competition. Special and rescue underground robotics. Robotics and Technical Cybernetics, 11(1), pp.5-11.

UDC identifier:
796.093:007.52

References 

  1. Meshcheryakov, R.V. and Ilyukhin, B.V. (2022). Review of robotics competition. Games sport robotics. Robotics and Technical Cybernetics, 10(4), pp.255-260.
  2. RTC CUP, (2022). [online]. Available at: https://cup.rtc.ru/ (Accessed 10 November 2022).
  3. NIST, (2022). [online]. Available at: https://www.nist.gov/el/intelligent-systems-division-73500/standard-test-methods-response-robots (Accessed 10 November 2022).
  4. RoboCup Rescue, (2022). [online]. Available at: https://rrl.robocup.org/ (Accessed 15 April 2022).
  5. DARPA Subterranean Challenge, (2018). Competitors in the DARPA Subterranean Challenge Virtual Competition, [online]. Available at: https://subtchallenge.world/home (Accessed 10 November 2022).
  6. Enrich 2023, (2022). European Robotics Hackathon, [online]. Available at: https://enrich.european-robotics.eu/ (Accessed 15 April 2022).
  7. Fukushima Innovation Coast Framework (2019). Fukushima Robot Test Field. Available at: https://www.fipo.or.jp/robot/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/robot_test_field_en.pdf (Accessed 15 April 2022).
  8. Mezhdunarodnye obrazovatel'nye STEAM-sorevnovaniya po robototekhnike [International educational STEAM-competitions in robotics], [online]. Available at: https://future-engineers.ru/first (Accessed 15 April 2022).
  9. [online]. Available at: https://robofinist.ru/ (Accessed 15 April 2022).
  10. [online]. Available at: https://www.robofest.ru/ (Accessed 15 April 2022).
  11. Abdikeyev, N.M. et al. (2014). Innovatsionnoye Razvitiye Rossii: Problemy I Resheniya: Monografiya [Innovative Development of Russia: Problems And Solutions: Monograph], Moscow,1376. (in Russian).
  12. Ilyukhin, B.V., Lepustin, A.V. and Katsman, Yu.Ya. (2015). Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye vliyaniya kontekstnykh faktorov na uroven' podgotovlennosti abituriyentov uchrezhdeniy vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Mathematical modeling of the influence of contextual factors on the level of preparedness of applicants from institutions of higher professional education of the Russian Federation]. Doklady Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta sistem upravleniya i radioelektroniki [Reports of the Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics], 2(36), pp.183-188.
  13. Gagarin, A.S. (2018). Kak izmenilsya Robofinist za 5 let: rasskazyvayut uchastniki [How Robofinist has changed in 5 years: participants tell]. Zanimatel'naya Robototekhnika [Entertaining Robotics]. [online]. Available at: http://edurobots.ru/2018/10/robofinist-5/ (Accessed 15 April 2022).
  14. Filippov, S.A. (2013). Robototekhnika dlya detey i roditeley [Robotics for children and parents], St. Petersburg, Nauka, p.213.
  15. Lepustin, A., Spitsyn, V., Ilyukhin, B. and Smyslova, E. (2014). The automation of the procedures of the educational progress assessment as a method of educational quality improving. In: 2014 9th International Forum on Strategic Technology, Advanced Technology: Recent Trends and Their Implications, 9, pp.109-112.
  16. Buslova, N. and Klimenko, E. (2020). Opyt provedeniya ranney proforientatsii detey posredstvom vovlecheniya v tekhnicheskoe tvorchestvo [Experience of early career guidance of children through involvement in technical creativity]. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education], 4. DOI: 10.17513/spno.30030. (in Russian).