Product quality management at the stages of the life cycle of robotic complexes in the conditions of pilot production

Product quality management at the stages of the life cycle of robotic complexes in the conditions of pilot production

Sergey V. Mogilnikov
Russian State Scientific Center for Robotics and Technical Cybernetics (RTC), Head of Quality Management, 21, Tikhoretsky pr., Saint Petersburg, 194064, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., ORCID: 0009-0000-2743-6654

Alena A. Tarasova
RTC, Expert, 21, Tikhoretsky pr., Saint Petersburg, 194064, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., ORCID: 0009-0008-3751-1142

Received June 21, 2024

Abstract
Providing scientific organizations of the innovative development cycle with advanced technologies for the creation and production of robotic complexes is a prerequisite for achieving high quality indicators and managing them at all stages of the creation of robotic complexes, in order to maintain the proper level. This article discusses the problem of product quality assurance at all stages of the life cycle of robotic complexes in the conditions of pilot production. The paper provides an overview of the factors influencing the quality of a robotic complex, examines and analyzes existing quality management methods in the realities of pilot production and proposes an improved approach to quality management at all stages of the life cycle of robotic complexes. The proposed approach will minimize the risk of errors and improve the process of creating a robotic complex in scientific enterprises of the innovative development cycle (pilot and experimental production).

Key words
Robotics complex, quality management, life cycle, digitalization, automation, computer-aided design systems.

EDN
EFTKLB

Bibliographic description
Mogilnikov. S.V. and Tarasova, A.A. (2024), "Product quality management at the stages of the life cycle of robotic complexes in the conditions of pilot production", Robotics and Technical Cybernetics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5-11, EDN: EFTKLB. (in Russian).

UDC identifier
005.6:004.896:007.52

References

  1. Shorahmatova, Sh.F., Melikov, F.K. and Nikonorova, L.I. (2022), “Robotics in the modern world”, Nauka i obrazovanie, vol. 5, no. 2, available at: https://opusmgau.ru/index.php/see/article/view/4715 (Accessed 7 January, 2024). (in Russian).
  2. Lopota, A.V. and Spassky, B.A. (2020), “Mobile ground-based robot systems for professional use”, Robotics and Technical Cybernetics, 8(1), pp. 5-17, DOI: 10.31776/RTCJ.8101.
  3. Federal Technical Regulation and Metrology Agency (2018), GOST R 53791—2010: Resursosberezhenie. Stadii zhiznennogo cikla izdelij proizvodstvenno-tehnicheskogo naznachenija. Obshhie polozhenija [GOST R 53791—2010: Resource saving. Stages of the life cycle of products for industrial and technical purposes. General provisions], Standartinform, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian).
  4. Borisov, A.B. (2021), “New product: reasons for failures and key success factors”, JOURNAL OF Economics, Entrepreneurship fnd Law, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2027-2044, DOI: 10.18334/epp.11.8.113228.
  5. Tehpis, “Main mistakes when developing technical specifications and how to avoid them@, available at: https://tehpis.ru/services/razrabotka_tekhnicheskikh_zadaniy/osnovnye-oshibki-pri-razrabotke-tekhnicheskogo-zadaniya-i-kak-ikh-izbezhat/ (Accessed 7 January, 2024). (in Russian).
  6. StudFile, “Design errors”, available at: https://studfile.net/preview/1811268/page:28/ (Accessed 7 January, 2024). (in Russian).
  7. Jurin, D.S., Shipunova, E.V. and Deniskina, E.R. (2023), “Identifying errors and inconsistencies in design documentation by checking formal requirements”, Izvestija Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Tehnicheskie nauki, no. 5, DOI: 10.24412/2071-6168-2023-7-169-170. (in Russian).
  8. StudFile, “Metrological control of design and technological documentation”, available at: https://studfile.net/preview/1811268/page:32/ (Accessed 7 January, 2024). (in Russian).
  9. Federal Technical Regulation and Metrology Agency (2016), GOST R 60.0.3.1-2016: Roboty i robototehnicheskie ustrojstva Vidy ispytanij [GOST R 60.0.3.1-2016: Robots and robotic devices Types of tests], Standartinform, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian).
  10. Foronosova, E. (2022), Design and technological documentation as an object of protection, [Online], available at: https://vc.ru/u/1091118-elena-foronosova/392905-konstruktorskaya-i-tehnologicheskaya-dokumentaciya-kak-obekt-zashity (Accessed 7 January, 2024). (in Russian).
  11. Lopota, A.V. et al. (2023), Otchet o vypolnenii kompleksnogo proekta. Razrabotka i vnedrenie programmno-apparatnogo kompleksa tehnologicheskoj podgotovki i upravlenija proizvodstvennymi processami (zakljuchitel'nyj, jetap 3, jetap 4) [Report on the implementation of a complex project. Development and implementation of a hardware and software complex for technological preparation and management of production processes (final, stage 3, stage 4)], RTC, St. Petersburg, Russia. (in Russian).
  12. Mogilnikov, S.V. and Prjamicyn, I.B. (2024), “An approach to the implementation of an information and algorithmic complex of software and hardware for the development of robotic complexes for test operation”, In: Proceedings of the 34th International Scientific and Technological Conference “EXTREME ROBOTICS”, no. 1 (34). (in Russian).
  13. Federal Technical Regulation and Metrology Agency (2019), GOST RV 0015-703-2019: System for the development and production of military equipment. The procedure for filing and satisfying complaints. Basic provisions [GOST RV 0015-703-2019: System for the development and production of military equipment. The procedure for filing and satisfying complaints. Basic provisions], Russia. (in Russian).